Oregon AFSCME Corrections

Arbitrations, Rulings and Grievances

 

Arbitrations

  1. Smoking Policy     February 29, 2000    COMINCO LTD. (the ‘Employer’) v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 9705

  2. Training Private Employees    July 07, 2000    Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, AFSCME Local 11 v. State of Ohio, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.

  3. Background Checks    May 19, 2000    Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Complainant v. State of Oregon, Department of Public Safety Standards and Training, Respondent. ORS 243.672(1)(e), Case No. UP-56-98
  4. Representation of DOC personnel    May 01, 2000    Association of Oregon Correction Employees, Complainant v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Respondent and AFSCME, Council 75, Intervenor. ORS 243.672(1)(a), (b), (c), and (f), Case No. UP-23-98
  5. Unit Clarification    March 17, 2000    Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Petitioner v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Respondent and AFSCME, Council 75, Incumbent. Unit Clarification. Case No. UC-24-99
  6. Unit Clarification    May 01, 2000    Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Petitioner v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Respondent and AFSCME, Council 75, Incumbent. OAR 115-25-005(6) unit clarification petition. Case No. UC-25-99
  7. Employment Discrimination    May 19, 1999    BRUCE ANGLIN, Respondent - Cross-Appellant,v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EASTERN OREGON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, and STATE OF OREGON, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON (9511-08389; CA A97408)
  8. Confidenttial Employees    July 26, 2000    Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Local 2479-2 v. Morrow County, Unit Clarification, Case No. UC-2-00
  9. Interest Arbitration Award    September 26, 2000    Lane County Peace Officers' Association v. Lane County. ORS 243.672(1)(e), ORS 243.672(1)(a) and (b). Case No. UP-28-00
  10. Duty to Provide Information    August 08, 2000   AFSCME Local 328, Complainant v. Oregon Health Sciences University, Respondent. ORS 243.672(1)(e), Case No. UP-47-99
  11. PECBA Violation    October 10, 2000    Oregon State Police Officers' Association, Complainant v. State of Oregon, Department of State Police and Department of Administrative Services, Respondent Case No. UP-30-00. In the Matter of Interest Arbitration between State of Oregon, Department, Petitioner v. Oregon State Police Officers' Association, Respondent. Case No. AR-3-00.
  12. Permissive Subjects    October 04, 2000    City of Portland, Complainant, v. Portland Firefighters Association, Local 43, Respondent. ORS 243.672(2)(b), Case No. UP-21-00
  13. Information Requests    October 17, 2000    AFSCME Local 328, Complainant v. Oregon Health Sciences University, Respondent. ORS 243.672(1)(e), Case No. UP-47-99
  14. Unit Clarification    December 08, 2000    Oregon State Police Officers' Association, Petitioner v. State of Oregon, Department of State Police, Respondent and Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Incumbent, OAR 115-25-005(6) Unit Clarification Petition. Case No. UC-6-00
  15. Jury Duty    December 02, 1994    Anaconda-Deer Lodge County and Police Protective Association Local 1
  16. AFSCME 2001 - 2003 Interest Arbitration between The State of Oregon Department of Administrative Services on behalf of Department of Corrections Security Employees and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. IA-07-01.
  17. Transferred Employees    January 15, 2002    Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Complainant v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Respondent and Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Intervenor / Case No. UP-4-01
  18. Unit Clarification    December 05, 2001    Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Association, Petitioner v. Multnomah County, Respondent and AFSCME Local 88, Incumbent, Case No. UC-14-01
  19. Right to Representation    January 10, 2002    Oregon AFSCME Council 75, Local 3940, Complainant v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections, Respondent / Case No. UP-3-00